Client results

Growth that's measured.
Not assumed.

Real outcomes from startups that replaced guesswork with clean data and measured spend. Every number here is verified.

Every number tied to a real engagement.
Verifiable.

Each case study below names the client, the engagement window, and the revenue figure we delivered against. Where attribution is partially modelled, we say so. Where it's directly measurable, we show the source.

We don't redact the awkward parts. If a campaign underperformed before it worked, the case study says so. If revenue is partially attributed, the percentage is on the page.

If a number looks too good to be true, ask us. We'll walk you through the data.

Outcomes from measured spend.

11+
Startups grown worldwide
−41%
Avg. CAC reduction
3.2x
Avg. pipeline growth
01 Saas

How Mowsix Grew Tasklo’s MRR From £9k to £20k Without Increasing Ad Spend

Tasklo had the traffic. What it did not have was a trial that converted: 0.8% of signups became customers. We fixed the measurement first, then the funnel.

The problem

Tasklo sells project management software to remote-first startups. Traffic was healthy. Trial conversion sat at 0.8%. Paid was profitable, so the obvious move was to spend more. They had already tried that. Spend went up and MRR stayed flat. Budget was never the constraint. Nobody at Tasklo could say which channels produced revenue, so every decision about where to put the next pound was a guess dressed up as a strategy.

Read full case study →
£20k
Monthly recurring revenue (from £9k)
−38%
Blended CAC
2.3%
Trial-to-paid conversion (from 0.8%)
The outcome

Monthly recurring revenue|£9k → £20k|Blended CAC|−38%|Trial conversion rate|0.8% → 2.3%|Trial-to-paid conversion|2.9× baseline

02 Fintech

How Mowsix Reduced Kredify’s CAC by 62% With Same Spend

Kredify was spending ₦1M a month on Meta with no way to prove any of it was working. Ten weeks later it had a verified 4.1× ROAS and a blended CAC less than half what it started with.

The problem

Kredify was spending ₦1M every month on Meta ads. Three systems tracked the results — the ads dashboard, the CRM, and the finance team's own records — and all three reported different sign-up numbers. Nobody could agree on what a sign-up was, so nobody could say whether the spend was working. The agency kept optimising toward form submissions. Most of them never became verified customers.

Read full case study →
4.1×
Verified ROAS
−62%
Cost per verified sign-up
₦2,100
Blended CAC (from ₦5,500)
The outcome

Verified ROAS|4.1×|Cost per verified sign-up|−62%|Blended CAC|₦2,100 (from ₦5,500)|Monthly Meta spend|₦1M (unchanged)

03 Saas

How Mowsix Increased Qualified Leads by 3.2x for PropTrack Analytics, Reduced Pricing Page Drop-Off by 34%

PropTrack's CRM was full of leads but couldn't show which ones became customers. Attribution mapping revealed LinkedIn was driving 61% of revenue on 22% of spend. Budget moved accordingly.

The problem

PropTrack's CRM was filling up with leads, but nobody could show which of them had become customers. Sales was qualifying leads the pipeline had never touched. Marketing reports showed channel spend. They didn't show which channels produced revenue. The team had a guess about what was working. They couldn't prove it either way.

Read full case study →
£90
CAC (from £135)
3.2×
Qualified pipeline
+67%
Inbound revenue
The outcome

CAC|£135 → £90|Qualified pipeline|3.2× baseline|Inbound revenue|+67%|Pricing page drop-off|−34%

04 Real Estate

How Mowsix Reduced CPL from £74 to £31 For Solara Homes, A Real Estate Startup

Solara's ads were producing leads at £74 each. Fewer than 1 in 10 were real buyers. We rebuilt lead scoring so the sales team only spoke to people who could complete. Cost per qualified lead fell to £31.

The problem

Solara's ads were generating leads at £74 each. Fewer than one in ten were real buyers. The sales team was spending three days a week qualifying people who couldn't get a mortgage, didn't have a deposit, or weren't buying for another year. The ad account was optimising toward form fills because that's all it could see. It had no visibility into what happened after the form.

Read full case study →
£31
Cost per qualified lead (from £74)
+58%
Qualified lead volume
1-in-3.5
Lead quality ratio (from 1-in-10)
The outcome

Cost per qualified lead|£74 → £31|Qualified lead volume|+58%|Lead quality ratio|1-in-10 → 1-in-3.5|New site launches from pipeline|+2

05 Real Estate

How Mowsix Increased Organic Landlord Enquiries For A Letting Agency In West Midlands

Vantage was renting its pipeline from Rightmove and Zoopla. Six months later it owned one, at £18 a landlord against £95 through the portals.

The problem

Vantage Lettings is a letting agency in the Midlands. Almost every landlord lead it got came from Rightmove or Zoopla, and every one carried a referral cost. That model works until you want to grow. Expanding into a new town meant buying more portal exposure in that town, so the cost of growth scaled in step with the growth itself. Every new landlord was £95. They wanted a channel they owned.

Read full case study →
4 → 31
Organic landlord enquiries per month
£18
Organic CAC (vs £95 via portals)
−40%
Portal ad spend
The outcome

Organic landlord enquiries|4 → 31 per month|Organic CAC|£18 vs £95 portal|Portal ad spend|−40%

06 Healthcare

How Mowsix 3x Monthly Appointment Bookings For a Nigerian Health Tech Startup

AfyaCare's agency was reporting clicks. The clinics needed to know about bookings, and which of those bookings turned into someone walking through the door. Same ad spend. 3.4× the appointments.

The problem

AfyaCare runs private clinics in Lagos and Abuja. A generalist agency was running its Google Ads. The reports arrived every month full of impressions and clicks. What they never contained was a number a clinic coordinator could use, because a click is not an appointment and an appointment is not a patient who turns up. Spend went out. Nobody could say what came back.

Read full case study →
3.4×
Monthly appointment bookings
−54%
Cost per booked appointment
68%
Patient attendance rate
The outcome

Monthly appointment bookings|3.4× baseline|Cost per booked appointment|−54%|Patient attendance rate|68% (from 61%)|Monthly ad spend|Unchanged

Want a number like these on your dashboard?

30-minute audit call. We diagnose your tracking, attribution, and the gap between spend and pipeline. No pitch.

Book your free audit ↗